If you would like to obtain a license/copy of the software, please contact Chad Penn. Also, if you would like help in designing a structure for your specific site, I would be happy to help in the design, assuming that you are able to provide certain model inputs.
A step by step description of the design and construction of a phosphorus (P) removal structure. Contact: Dr. Chad Penn (chad.penn@okstate.edu) and Dr. Josh McGrath (josh.smyrna@gmail.com)
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Update on software development
We are currently incorporating our model and several algorithms into
software that will be available through licensing by Oklahoma State
University. This software is mostly complete as of October 7th, 2014.
This software will aid
the users in properly designing a P removal structure for their site,
or it can be used to predict the performance and lifetime of a
constructed filter. Below is an example of one of the input screens. Mr. David Webb of Florida, is currently obtaining a license and will soon be providing the service of P removal structure construction in that area.
If you would like to obtain a license/copy of the software, please contact Chad Penn. Also, if you would like help in designing a structure for your specific site, I would be happy to help in the design, assuming that you are able to provide certain model inputs.
If you would like to obtain a license/copy of the software, please contact Chad Penn. Also, if you would like help in designing a structure for your specific site, I would be happy to help in the design, assuming that you are able to provide certain model inputs.
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Recent articles on P removal structures or PSMs
Some articles are more recent than others. Click to link.
Bell et al., 2014
Karczmarcyk and Bus, 2014
Klimeski et al., 2012
Klimeski et al., 2014
Lyngsie et al., 2014
Uusitalo et al., 2012
Canga et al., 2014
Lyngsie et al., 2014b
Penn et al., 2014
Wendling et al., 2014
Bell et al., 2014
Karczmarcyk and Bus, 2014
Klimeski et al., 2012
Klimeski et al., 2014
Lyngsie et al., 2014
Uusitalo et al., 2012
Canga et al., 2014
Lyngsie et al., 2014b
Penn et al., 2014
Wendling et al., 2014
New P removal structure leaflet
The field day presentation of the P removal structure in Westville, OK was successful. This leaflet, which is an OSU extension document, was made available to those who attended.
The Structure is still removing a cumulative P load of at least 70%. Thus far it has handled all flow, including an event that produced 500 gpm.
Depending on how quickly things proceed, the software for design guidance will be completed by the end of August and adoption into the EQIP cost share program should follow.
The Structure is still removing a cumulative P load of at least 70%. Thus far it has handled all flow, including an event that produced 500 gpm.
Depending on how quickly things proceed, the software for design guidance will be completed by the end of August and adoption into the EQIP cost share program should follow.
Monday, May 12, 2014
Spring update on P removal structure and presentation
Since installation in the fall, the P removal structure is still currently removing >90% of the cumulative dissolved P that has flowed into it. Please see the following link for a recent presentation: http://dasnr.adobeconnect.com/p7kmw6j1uwt/
Monday, March 17, 2014
New published paper on structure design
This paper is open access at the Journal of soil and water conservation. It summarizes much of the information in this blog regarding how to design a P removal structure tailored to a specific site.
We will continue to update this blog with results from the P removal structure.
We will continue to update this blog with results from the P removal structure.
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
First field day presentation of poultry farm structure and update
Field day announcement
There will be a field day presentation of the poultry farm runoff P filter on May 23rd, 2014 in Westville, OK. The flyer and schedule of events is shown here. Hope to see you there! Please contact me for any additional information or questions.
Current performance of the structure
Since completion of the P removal structure last fall there has been very little precipitation here. Thus far there has been only two events that have produced runoff at the site. Both sets of samples showed nearly 100% P removal. Due to problems with our connectivity to the automatic samplers, we cannot state what the flow rates were. However, we will manually download the data to determine flow rates and duration.
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Installation and sieving of steel slag
Before pouring slag into the structure, it was necessary to
sieve the material to > ¼”. This was
done on a large scale at a gravel quarry next door to the steel mill located in
Ft. Smith, Arkansas. A liner was placed
on the bottom of the structure before dumping the sieved material into it. A liner was also placed on the outflow side of
the structure (i.e. “apron”) in order to channel all of the treated water into
the flume for monitoring purposes.
The sides of this outflow apron were constructed with
railroad ties. In the above picture they
are covered with the liner.
The perforated drainage pipes were placed at the floor of
the structure (on top of the liner) before covering it with the sieved
slag. Note that these drainage pipes
channel water to the outlet of the structure, which is comprised of expanded
metal. Between 35 and 40 tons of slag
was dumped into the structure use a skid steer:
We ran out of sieved slag near the end, so we had to sieve
around 10 tons of slag to produce 6 more tons of >1/4” slag. I’m pretty irritated in the picture below because
the concrete vibrator that was used to screen the material kept breaking all of
our U-bolts:
Eventually we ran out of U-bolts and we cleaned out the
local hardware store for U-bolts. At
that point we had to sieve it the old fashioned way. The guy on the right is Stan Roberts, a
salesman from Automatic Engineering, the distributor for ISCO auto samplers in
Oklahoma. Stan was supposed to stop by to
help with programming…..hahaha, but we put him to good use since we were not
yet ready for programming. That is a
good salesman right there. Steps out of
the office and does some “hands on” work with no complaints.
During the installation, we forgot to stabilize the
downstream “gate”. After it was filled
with slag, the metal started to bow. Note
that the wood in the picture below was temporary. It was removed after the slag was treated
in-situ.
We managed to remove the bow in the metal gate using a
come-along and 40 feet of chain. After we
pulled it back, we stabilized it by pounding several ½” rebar into metal
sleeves welded to the gate. I wish I had
a picture of that process because it was pretty awesome. Again, the slag was treated in-situ. The samplers were set up (which is what we called
Stan for!) and were placed in their own respective buildings:
We rolled out some erosion control mats and seeded uphill of
the structure. Trimmed the excess
liner. We also built a new suction head
for the samplers to be able to handle a very shallow depth of water.
At this point we are ready to collect samples! Just offhand, I hope that we can have a field
day presentation in January. We will
continue to update this blog with results.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



